Just a thought that’s been rolling around in my head since your Prussia nationhood hc. So could the way Prussia is still around after dissolution explain how Poland has stayed as his land personification even through the times Poland was wiped off the map, since we know that it’s the same person rather than a new one when Poland was put back on the map, if that makes sense. I don’t know, it just got me thinking about the whole Phoenix country Poland thing…

History’s got your back with that answer, except the situation’s a bit different between the two. Poland has a distinct group of people, a culture, and a language. Prussia shares all this with Germany, who assumed full representation of German identity after WW2 or arguably, after German Reunification if we make the obvious conclusion that Prussia is East Germany. Seriously, though. Why call him East instead of East Germany? 

Like, enough with the teasing. Also, I should probably mention that Prussia working for Russia doesn’t 100% prove that he’s East Germany. It just proves that Prussia’s land fell under Russian control after WW2. There’s also hints of Prussia working together with Latvia in the Eastern bloc, but, hey, I’m getting on another tangent. 

Tonight, I’ll try to explain how Poland’s remained despite being partitioned and destroyed several times. Basically, while Poland assumes full representation over Polish identity (his people, their culture, and their history) which never truly disappeared despite falling under foreign jurisdiction, Prussia doesn’t have the benefit of claiming full representation over the German people (which makes him weaker in modern times).

So yeah, theory on Poland coming up 🙂