Can you analyze the relationships between the countries and their leaders? I think it would be very interesting. Would they represent their people’s view points while maybe having their own?

+ 

“Do you think that nations can go against their bosses and governments? Or do you think that they have the same beliefs as them? Can
the people influence the nation?”

What you’ll see is a complicated blend of what you two
asked.

For the most part, they’re bound by their bosses’ orders. It
does happen, but very rarely do they go against them.

Of course, it’s important to consider that the nations have minds
of their own and often disagree with the orders they’re given. Some of what
they’re told to do isn’t in their peoples’ best interest. The irony is that the
nations exist because of their people, not the government alone:

Lastly, because the nations work under their leaders’ orders,
they’re primarily reactive to their peoples’ perceptions of them.

Ex: Russia expresses
dismay during the Bloody Sunday revolt, given how hard he had worked to improve his
country for the betterment of all.

Ex: After the
Revolutionary government gains power, France is prevented from dressing
aristocratically in the fear that he’ll be assaulted.

With all that cleared out of the way, an analysis of the
nations’ bosses coming up tonight!