I think the point with Taiwan was simply that the example you took isn’t as indicative as you claim, it’s you deciding to see it that way but it could as well be seen in a different light. You’re usually very good about this, but sometimes you do slip your own interpretation and claim it as canon (or maybe it’s just the wording). A misstep is perfectly understandable (you’re a human being, and you’re really doing a lot), but since you have such a big following you should be more careful.

Of course, I’ve admitted to my bias before and I understand that there’s a subjective element in interpretation. On the other hand, that’s not what occurred here. I’m very careful in the words I use. I didn’t use definitive language and didn’t declare it to be canon! 

“

Strips have suggested that Taiwan may be attracted to women.” 

I should also note that you guys hold me accountable. If I make a mistake (which does happen, like you said especially given how much canon material there is to deal with) I immediately correct myself. The goal is to be as accurate as possible.