…That moment
when you realize that Russia always places a hand over his chest to prevent his heart
from falling out.


Well, I mean, it’s included as part of his character
notes. But, if you’re looking for an explicit example, there’s plenty of instances where he’s shown to “escape reality.”
Here, he’s building a railroad under Stalin’s orders. To
cope with these miserable conditions, he begins fantasizing about warmer
weather.


Totally agree. What I was trying to get at is how people
blindly say “agh! Politics!” as a general bandwagon hate comment without really
understanding the meaning of what they’re saying. A series involving political
personifications is obviously going to be political.
Like you said, headcanons are perfectly fine in my opinion
as long as they don’t promote hatred or elicit any violence. Deeming these
headcanons to be canon is an entirely different matter. There’s a level of
maturity when it comes to respecting other people’s interpretations, and not
infringing on them is something this fandom needs to do better. It’s the same
thing as respecting ships (with the exception of the more problematic ones).
Getting offended by an opinion just because it differs from
yours makes you immature. However, politely engaging with the person, stating
your reasons why you disagree, and accepting that their opinion may differ from yours regardless is what a decent person would do.
It’s impossible to please and agree with everyone. What’s
possible is ignoring the content/ opinions you don’t like. Enjoy the things you
like and respect that what other people like may not fall in line with your
interests.
Don’t be petty. Simple.


The answer to the above question, if there aren’t any
inconsistencies with the timeline, is unbelievably fast. So fast in fact that
Germany completely dethrones America’s path to maturity. America goes from a
toddler, to a young child, a young adolescent, and only becomes an adult after
he achieves full independence.
Meanwhile, Germany goes from a young child to an adolescent/
young adult within one year.
No, I’m not kidding. The strips covering both Industrial
Revolutions testify to this claim.
The first Industrial Revolution took place in England in the
late 1800s (approximately 1760) and lasted up until around 1870.

The Second
Industrial Revolution had less to do with the textile industries and more to do
with machinery and steel. That’s where Germany comes in.

At the start of the second Industrial Revolution, Germany
hadn’t unified and therefore lacked behind in the industrial developments that
neighboring countries experienced.
After unification
(1871), this changed, and Germany became heavily involved in the machining
industry. Notice this panel here. Germany is immediately put to work…right
after being born.

That’s not the type of work a child would be capable of
doing, let me tell you.
Germany’s awkward mannerisms as he and Prussia converse with
England makes me believe that he’s a teenager here. He’s still new to the
world, and hasn’t quite figured out how to navigate it.

Here Germany is again, modifying English machinery.

Throughout these strips, Germany is not once shown to be a
child. His aged appearance combined with the phrase “after the unification”, as
well as the panel illustrating him instantly being put to work, hints at a
dramatic and unparalleled growth spurt in contrast with the other nations.

Now, think about this in terms of how relationally-impaired
and awkward Germany is with others. He never got to experience a proper
childhood. In the field of psychology, childhood is crucial; it’s where you
acquire and develop proper socialization skills.
If this is all true, then Germany never had a childhood. Well,
maybe.
He could always be
Holy Rome, but what’s important to reiterate here is that if Germany is Holy Rome, then he’s shown little signs
of remembering this childhood…


I agree, that scene
where Italy’s catapulted into the air by a faulty car seat does reveal a bit of
naivety on Germany’s part.

On the other hand, Germany’s
young age is mentioned several times in the manga. There’s also the fact that the scene above took place during WW2. Germany would have learned a lot more since then.

There’s no definitive answer, but I have picked up on a few
relatively consistent rules. It’s often a combination of these factors.
It’s
still very messy, though, as Hima doesn’t spoonfeed us the information!
1)
Sovereignty,
autonomy, or political independence. (varies depending on if you’re
recognized as a nation-state, are a dominion, are under colonial rule, are a
self-regulating micro-nation…etc.)
2)
Economic
stability, growth, and self-sufficiency. (i.e. whether your economy is
doing poorly, is stagflated, isn’t growing much, ability to produce your own
goods and commerce…etc.)
3)
A
well-developed culture and history
4)
A
significant body of people + a stable, functioning government.


Hetalia has often been mischaracterized as something that
promotes and glorifies violence. Why? Because the initial setting takes place
in World War 2. Somehow that automatically equates to said negative image.
To that, I say this. There’s a difference between situating
a historical context and using explicit insignia to support an abhorrent
ideology. You never see the latter portrayal in the series.
While I disagree with a lot of Hima’s early characterizations and miscalculated jokes, his depiction of
fascism, communism, and war is something that I’ve always respected. It’s done
tastefully (with comical hyperbolic elements, of course), and does anything but
promote violence.

That said, it’s also important to mention that the
insensitive war jokes used in the dub are completely irrelevant to the messages
of peace and solidarity that Hima incorporates into his work. That’s the result
of other people interpreting the series and making it their own, only to botch
it entirely.
Regardless of the fact that war’s going on, Hima makes an effort
to showcase the triumph of humane and compassionate qualities in the nations.
Yes, they ‘hate’ and wage wars against each other – not having much of a choice over the matter,
mind you – but this rivalry doesn’t hold them hostage, nor does it dictate how
they interact with each other.
Conflict doesn’t dehumanize the nations; they don’t become
ruthless killing machines without a semblance of remorse or empathy. Just like
enemy soldiers called ceasefires on Christmas and occasionally organized sports
events, the nations for the most part
engage in similar civilities.
Again, it’s the conflict that’s brutal, not the nations
themselves. In fact, they have some of their admirable, most striking moments during war.
When America occupies Rome, he treats both Italies as if
they were his friends. Romano’s clearly terrified, but America breaks the ice
by politely asking them if they could make him authentic Italian food. That’s
hardly something you would see with individuals who regard each other as
enemies.



You also see nations from different alliances casually
hanging out during war, almost as if there wasn’t one going on at all. Remember
that they’ve fought each other so many times that they’ve likely matured past
being pent up on rivalries, as long as interacting with enemy nations doesn’t
go against their people’s well-being.
As they share and try each other’s rations, familiarity
appears to triumph over hostility.



There’s a clear reason why the series’ main theme is “Draw a
circle, that’s the Earth,” rather than, “Draw a border, that’s my country.”
It’s to bring the world together, not tear it apart.

England: You don’t know anything about world geography, do
you?
America: Not sure what you mean. Could you be more pacific?
He loves Twilight.
If anything, that’s where England went the most wrong in raising him.


