Tag: thanks for stopping by

Ella, can you please compile a list of all the Hetalia characters that have canon magical abilities, can see magical-esque creatures, or generally have something supernatural about them and list what it is that they can see/do/et cetera? I’m sorry if this is a vague definition. I’m writing a story and I really need to know this so I can sort the character’s roles out. This would be really helpful to have a master list like this, so you’d have my sincere gratitude if you could help a girl out!

Sure thing! Although, I’m going to omit talking about ghosts for the most part, as there’s still some inconsistencies I’m piecing through with a few of the characters.

Supernatural post coming up tonight!

image

People also seem to forget that new Hetalia merch is released all the time + we just got the musicals, and we would NEVER get them if the publishers thought there weren’t enough people who want to buy/go to see them. Some of the merch is also expensive (like the dolls dor example), and I’m sure only fans of the series buy them (if they have money). So they wouldn’t release them if Hetalia was “dead”.

^

^

^

^

^  

👏

🍬

👏

🍬

👏

🍬 

👏

What other psych-talia posts do you have lined up?

Please note that Freud’s concepts are allegorical in nature and are not meant to be taken on a literal level…

Psychoanalyzing the German brothers’ personalities + childhoods


Psychoanalyzing America’s personality + childhood

The effects of being weaned off too early; in other words, gaining independence and autonomy at a young age.


Psychoanalyzing Belarus: 

She clearly has a phallic fixation, and at least alludes to Freud’s notion of castration anxiety. The amount of times she talks about ripping off male genitalia/ anything to do with them is the biggest clue of this. 


Psychoanalyzing Hungary:
Hungary also has a phallic fixation, except it’s more to do with Freud’s notion of penis envy (again, this is allegorical). The amount of times she talks about having male genitalia during childhood is the most obvious clue of this.

So…Is Russia good or bad?

I don’t think he’s either.

Used loosely here, a ‘good’ person has a righteous morality, meanwhile a ‘bad’ person has an unacceptable morality (immoral).

If you’re incapable of understanding the consequences (both good and bad) of your actions, then you can’t possess morals. Russia’s too complex to box his character into one category. Having any morality means knowing the difference between right and wrong, an ability that Russia doesn’t consistently possess. 

In other words, Russia’s amoral. However, that doesn’t mean he can’t show moments of kindness or have good intentions..